The IBSWO appreciate the government for removing FDI from the minging policy

Shillong, November 28: The  Indigenous  Biodiversity  &  Social  Welfare  Organisation  (IBSWO) –  Meghalaya  appreciates  the  fact  that  the  Government  of  Meghalaya  has  taken  pains  to  bring  out  a  policy  document  on  mining  of  minerals  within  the  State  and  in  the  process,  has  over  the  years,  brought  out  many  draft  policies,  the  latest  being  The  Meghalaya  Mines  and  Minerals  Policy,  2012  which  perhaps  is  still  a  draft  policy   paper/document.

It  is  also  appreciated  that  the  present  draft  is  a  vast  improvement  on  the  previous  drafts,  perhaps  by  having  taken  serious  note  and  cognizance  of  suggestions  and  recommendations  made  from  various  quarters,  including   Civil  Society  Organizations  (CSOs)  and  Political  Parties.

In  particular,  we  would  like  to  point  out  certain  marked  inclusions  which  were  not  there  in  the  earlier  drafts.

Re:  PART – I, 1 Background

“1.5      The  land  tenure  system  in  the  State  is  largely  governed  by  customary  laws  and  practices.  The  Policy  objectives  will  be  in  consonance  with  such  laws  and  practices,  as  specifically  stipulated  in  the  Sixth  Schedule  to  the  Constitution  of  India  and  the  Meghalaya  Land  Transfer  (Regulation)  Act,  1971  and  the  relevant  laws  of  the  respective  District  Councils.”

Re:  4.  INFRASTRUCTURE  FOR  MINES  AND  MINERALS:

“4.7  The  Child  Labour  Laws  shall  be  taken  fully  into cognizance  in  this  policy.”

Re:  10.  REGULATORY  FRAMEWORK  FOR  THE  MINE  DEVELOPMENT  AND  MINING:

“b) Application  for  mineral  concession  either  fresh  or  renewal  is  to  be  submitted  to  the  State  Government  through  the  Deputy  Commissioner  of  the  District  wherein  the  area  applied  for  is  situated  and  with  NOC  from  District  Council  concerned  and  land owner;

“c) On  receipt  of  application,  the  Deputy  Commissioner  will  examine  the  same,  make  necessary  enquiry  with,  inter-alia,  land-owner  and  traditional  institutions  like  Headman,  Village/Local  Durbars  and  the  Autonomous  District  Council  about  the  applied  area  and  forward  the  application  with  a  report  to  the  Directorate  of  Mineral  Resources.”

However,  there  are  other  inclusions  raising  apparent  doubts  on  the  true  intent  of  the  published  draft  policy  under  examination  and  study  by  non-governmental  groups  like  IBSWO.

1.            First,  with  reference  to  10. b)  already  cited  above,  the  following  should  be  inserted  after  “District  Council  concerned  ”,  viz.  “Village/Local  Durbar”  to  be  followed  with  the  words  “and  land owner”   so  to  read  “  …  and  with  NOC  from  District  Council  concerned,  Village/Local  Durbar  and  land owner.”

 

2.            In  10  c)  the  word  “like”  appearing  after  “traditional  institutions”  and  before  “Headman”  should  be  substituted  by  the  word,  “namely”  or  its  short  form  “viz”  as  the  word  “like”  in  this  context  carries  no  weight   whatsoever.

3.            Re:  5.  REGULATION  OF  MINES  AND  MINERALS:

a.            Giving  reconnaissance  permit  to  a  “company”  meaning  and  implying  any  company  –  transnational  and  multinational is  compromising  the  security,  sovereignty  of  the  country  and  laying  bare  the  assets  and  resources  to  a  business  enterprise  having  no  patriotic  allegiance  and  concern  for  biodiversity.  And  that  too  up  to  100  Sq. Km.  As  it  is,  the  word  ‘reconnaissance’  is  a  military  terminology.

b.            The  terms  “100  Sq.  km”, “ 25  Sq. km”,  “10  Sq.km”  should  be  qualified  in  that  does  it  imply  distance  of  as  the  crow  flies  or  land  formation  with  ups  and  downs,  ridges  and  valleys  for  should  it  imply  the  former,  a  small  state  like  Meghalaya  cannot  afford  to  barter  away  its  natural  resources  including  biodiversity,  etc.  for  a  mess  of  pottage.  Further,  it  conflicts  with  provisos  of  the  Meghalaya  Land  Transfer  (Regulation)  Act.

4.            Re:  PART – II

6.            OBJECTIVES

(xii)  The  word  ‘geo-tourism’  should  be  substituted  with  the  word  ‘eco-tourism’    in  letter,  spirit  and  intent.

5.            Re:  19.  JOINT  VENTURE:

While  is  is  appreciated  that  the  proviso  allowing  Foreign  Direct  Investment  (FDI)  has  been  removed  in  the  present  draft,  the  insertion  of  Single  Window  Agency  and  offering  incentives  as  per  provisos  of  the  State’s  Industrial  Policy,  1997  is  fraught  with  possibilities  of  misuse  and  abuse  as  had  been  seen  both  in  SWA –  1995  and  the  MIP-  1997  and  the  earlier  provisos  empowering  traditional  institutions  will  become  weak.

Therefore,  IBSWO  wishes  for  Government  to  withhold  implementing  the  draft  policy  in  its  present  form  unless  the  controversial  new  provisos  are  totally  deleted.(SP News)

 

Government of Meghalaya Launches Megha Health Insurance Scheme

Shillong, November 27, 2012: Government of Meghalaya (GoM), with advisorysupport from the International Finance Corporation (IFC) and the WorldBank, today signed an agreement with ICICI Lombard General Insurance CoLtd. (ICICI) to roll out a comprehensive health insurance scheme which willbenefit all the residents of the state. Christened the Megha HealthInsurance Scheme (MHIS), the scheme will provide all households in thestate with a financial cover of upto Rs 1,60,000 per year to coverin-patient services, irrespective of income levels.

 

The new health insurance scheme is among the first of its type acrossIndia. It uses the standard RSBY platform supported by the Ministry ofLabour and Employment, Government of India and expands the cover availableunder RSBY both in terms of universalizing the scheme across the entirepopulation instead of just those covered under the Below Poverty Line (BPL)List; and also in terms of deepening the scheme to provide an enhancedcover of upto Rs. 1,60,000 instead of Rs. 30,000, thereby providing for

cashless treatment of specified high cost and recurrent illnesses.The agreement was signed in Shillong by Mr. Meban R. Synrem, IAS, CEO,Megha Health Insurance Scheme and Secretary, Department of Health andFamily Welfare, and Mr. Pranab Sharma, Associate Vice President, ICICI

Lombard in the presence of the Chief Minister of Meghalaya, Dr. Mukul Sangma, Chief Secretary, Mr W M S Pariat, Commissioner & Secretary Health & Family Welfare, Mr D P Wahlang and representatives from the IFC and the World Bank. ICICI was selected as the insurer after a rigorous and competitive bidding process advised by the IFC in which bids were received from six leading insurers, resulting in a reduction in premium per household payable by the Government.

The scheme will be integrated with the existing public health system of Meghalaya by empanelling public sector hospitals as well as private hospitals in the State and engaging with the Govt Health Care providers through rigorous training and performance based incentives. The scheme will also augment the availability of advanced care facilities to the people of the State by requiring the insurance company to empanel tertiary care hospitals offering advance cardiac and cancer care services outside Meghalaya. The scheme will also maintain the country-wide portability inherent to the basic RSBY Scheme.

In the second phase, IFC and the World Bank will continue to provide advisory support to the Government for further enhancing the scope of coverage and benefits under the scheme.(SP News)

 

What Next?

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Submit Comment

*